|
Begonia - Spring 2005 |
|
Flower Color, Plot Development Over Time, Data and Comments |
|
Trials for this crop are being conducted in Bradenton. |
|
|
|
Vinca |
| GCREC-HOME | ORNAMENTALS RESEARCH PROGRAMS | BACK to CURRENT TRIAL |
|
Vinca |
|
Botany |
|||
| Family: | Begoniaceae (begonias). | ||
| Scientific names: | Begonia ×semperflorens-cultorum hort.* [The Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)], Begonia × hybrida Hort. [The International Plant Names Index (IPNI)]** (not listed in GRIN), and . | ||
| Common names: | *Bedding begonia, perpetual begonia or wax begonia (GRIN) and **angelwing begonia. | ||
| Native habitat: |
Only found in cultivation (GRIN). |
||
View
maps related to habitat and other topics from this link to the National
Geographic MapMachine: . |
|||
|
Pests |
|||
| Common plant arthropods (insects/other)/other: | Reported arthropod symptoms in literature: cyclamen mite (Featured Creatures, U. of Florida). | ||
| Arthropod symptoms observed in this trial: | |||
| Common plant diseases/other: | Reported disease symptoms in literature: Botrytis cineraria, gray mold; Xanthomonas caperstris pv. begoniae, bacerial leafspot; ringspot (possible virus); edema (physiological problem). (Index of Plant Diseases in Florida, 1984 revision.). | ||
| Diseases symptoms observed in this trial: | |||
| Commercial control: | Greenhouse. | Feld/shade house. | |
| Arthropod information: | Pests identified on crops. | Florida pest facts and images. | |
| Disease information: | Plant Disease Facts (Pennsylvania State University) | The American Phytopathological Society | |
| More Links and Information | |||
| Performance evaluations: | Trial reports and other publications. | ||
| More resources: | Additional information. | ||
| Honors: | Best-of-class (BC). We select the best performer in each class, based on the "overall performance rating". This rating may not be high, if the class does not perform well (indicating a possible need for improvement in the class). The rating may be significantly different from one or more members of the class. If two or more members of a class received the same highest overall performance rating, we used another rating (such as overall foliage/flower rating or flower average rating) to determine BC. If only one cultivar was entered in a class, it automatically becomes uncontested BC. BC is evaluated in future trials against the performance of new entries in the same class. Refer to a report in "Articles, Papers & Reports" for detailed information. In addition to BC, other "honors" received for these cultivars may be added to BC at a later date, time permitting. Seed companies may forward these honors (awards) to Rick Kelly. |
| Rating System: | The rating is a 1 to 7 scale: 7- all foliage and flowers free from defects; 4- average foliage and flower condition, minimal plant defects or pest damage to tissue, but still acceptable; 1- foliage and/or flowers with severe defects and/or severely infested with pests and damage unacceptable, making plant undesirable. Plant death due to soilborne pests may be factored into the overall performance rating, if it is a significant problem. Refer to a report in "Articles, Papers & Reports" for details. If listed, ratings with an "a" are the best in a class. If cultivars share the same letters, those ratings are considered to be similar to each other. If there are no letters, there is only one cultivar in a class or all the members of a class have similar ratings. |
|
Scroll down the page or click on the color of choice to view individual cultivars within a color class: |
| Begonia × hybrida | |
| Pink Class | White/Rose Class |
| Pink Class | Red Class |
| Rose Class | White Class |
|
Winter |
| Note: This trial was conducted under 30 % shade in Bradenton with previously fumigated beds that had plastic mulch removed before the research center relocated to Balm, Florida. In order to accommodate all the cultivars entered for evaluation, only three plants/cultivar/plot could be planted. Each plot was closely planted to its neighbor, requiring that areas of many plot photographs be blocked out to exclude plants that are not part of the plot and might cause confusion. There are three plots grown for each cultivar evaluation. For this crop, all plots in row 1 were selected for display, while any better plots from row 2 or 3 are also displayed for comparison. |
|
Winter |
| Begonia × hybrida |
|
In this evaluation of a new uncontested rose/white class cultivar, we conducted a special comparison with a Begonia ×hybrida pink class (established in spring 2004). Both cultivars qualified for display in our best-of-class public gardens with foliage/flower ratings > 4.5 and overall performance ratings > 5.0 and will be added to our Best of the Best-of-class spring list. |
|
Pink Class |
|
Picture date: |
21 May (week 15 1) | 5 June (week 17) | 19 June (week 19) | ||||
|
'Braveheart' |
Plot A Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot B Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot B Sprayed Field |
|
|||
| Cultivar No: 33 | |||||||
|
Picture date: |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Seed Sowing Date |
Flower Diameter |
Days to First Flower2 |
Overall Foliage/Flower Rating3 |
Overall Pest Rating4 |
Overall Performance Rating5 |
| 2/8/2005 | 4.1 cm (1.6 inches) | 85 | 4.9 | 6.8 | 5.9 |
| Honors: Best-of-class, uncontested. |
| Comments: New entry for 2005. ‘Braveheart Rose BiColor’ and ‘BabyWing Pink’ appeared to be similar in performance. Very minor insect feeding and disease spot symptoms occurred. Pests were not identified. |
|
White/Rose Class |
|
Picture date: |
21 May (week 15 1) | 5 June (week 17) | 19 June (week 19) | ||||
|
'Babywing' |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
|
|||
| Cultivar No: 94 | |||||||
|
Picture date: |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Seed Sowing Date |
Flower Diameter |
Days to First Flower2 |
Overall Foliage/Flower Rating3 |
Overall Pest Rating4 |
Overall Performance Rating5 |
| 2/8/2005 | 4.6 cm (1.8 inches) | 85 | 4.8 | 6.9 | 5.8 |
| Honors: Best-of-class, uncontested. |
| Comments: Uncontested best-of-class in spring 2004. ‘BabyWing Pink’ and ‘Braveheart Rose BiColor’ appeared to be similar in performance. Very minor insect feeding and disease spot symptoms occurred. Pests were not identified. |
| Details of performance for this cultivar will be posted on the web in "Articles, Papers & Reports" at the completion of this trial. These details will include ratings over the entire season and pest problems. |
| Back to Color of Choice | Back to the Top |
|
Pink Class |
|
Picture date: |
21 May (week 15 1) | 5 June (week 17) | 19 June (week 19) | ||||
|
'Emperor Pink' |
Plot A Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field |
|
|||
| Cultivar No: 80 | |||||||
|
Picture date: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Seed Sowing Date |
Flower Diameter |
Days to First Flower2 |
Overall Foliage/Flower Rating3 |
Overall Pest Rating4 |
Overall Performance Rating5 |
| 2/8/2005 | 4.6 cm (1.8 inches) | 82 | 5.2 | 6.9 | 5.7 |
| Honors: Best-of-class. |
| Comments: New entry for 2005. ‘Emperor Pink’ replaced ‘Prelude Pink’ as best-of-class, the result of better ratings for foliage fullness and flower display all season; despite minor plant death from soilborne disease. |
|
Pink Class |
|
Picture date: |
21 May (week 15 1) | 5 June (week 17) | 19 June (week 19) | ||||
|
'Emperor Soft Pink' |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field |
|
|||
| Cultivar No: 83 | |||||||
|
Picture date: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Seed Sowing Date |
Flower Diameter |
Days to First Flower2 |
Overall Foliage/Flower Rating3 |
Overall Pest Rating4 |
Overall Performance Rating5 |
| 2/8/2005 | 4.5 cm (1.8 inches) | 78 | 4.3 | 6.0 | 5.2 |
| Honors: |
| Comments: New entry for 2005. Foliage development and uniformity fair between late May and early June, while flower display poor in May and fair in June. More plant death from soilborne disease than the other pink cultivars. |
|
Pink Class |
|
Picture date: |
21 May (week 15 1) | 5 June (week 17) | 19 June (week 19) | ||||
|
'Prelude Pink' |
Plot A Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
|
|||
| Cultivar No: 52 | |||||||
|
Picture date: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Seed Sowing Date |
Flower Diameter |
Days to First Flower2 |
Overall Foliage/Flower Rating3 |
Overall Pest Rating4 |
Overall Performance Rating5 |
| 2/8/2005 | 3.3 cm (1.3 inches) | 86 | 4.6 | 6.9 | 5.7 |
| Honors: Former best-of-class (2002). |
| Comments: Established as best-of-class in Sp2002. Beat 'Bayou Pink' in Sp 2003 to remain best-of-class. ‘Emperor Pink’ replaced ‘Prelude Pink’ as best-of-class, the result of better ratings for foliage fullness and flower display all season; despite minor plant death from soilborne disease. |
| Details of performance for this cultivar will be posted on the web in "Articles, Papers & Reports" at the completion of this trial. These details will include ratings over the entire season and pest problems. |
| Back to Color of Choice | Back to the Top |
|
Red Class |
|
Picture date: |
21 May (week 15 1) | 5 June (week 17) | 19 June (week 19) | ||||
|
'Emperor Red' |
Plot A Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot B Sprayed Field |
|
|||
| Cultivar No: 81 | |||||||
|
Picture date: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Seed Sowing Date |
Flower Diameter |
Days to First Flower2 |
Overall Foliage/Flower Rating3 |
Overall Pest Rating4 |
Overall Performance Rating5 |
| 2/8/2005 | 4.4 cm (1.7 inches) | 75 | 5.3 | 6.7 | 6.0 |
| Honors: Best-of-class. |
| Comments: New entry for 2005. ‘Emperor Red’ replaced ‘Eureka Green Leaf Scarlet’ as best-of-class, due to fuller foliage between late May and early June, and more uniform flowering in late May. Leaf spot symptoms were very minor and sporadic on ‘Emperor Red’. Both cultivars experienced equally low plant death from soilborne disease. |
|
Red Class |
|
Picture date: |
21 May (week 15 1) | 5 June (week 17) | 19 June (week 19) | ||||
|
'Eureka Green Leaf Scarlet' |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field
|
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field |
|
|||
| Cultivar No: 95 | |||||||
|
Picture date: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Seed Sowing Date |
Flower Diameter |
Days to First Flower2 |
Overall Foliage/Flower Rating3 |
Overall Pest Rating4 |
Overall Performance Rating5 |
| 2/8/2005 | 4.2 cm (1.7 inches) | 96 | 4.3 | 6.8 | 5.5 |
| Honors: Former best-of-class (2002). |
| Comments: Best-of-class in 2002. ‘Eureka Green Leaf Scarlet’ was replaced by ‘Emperor Red’ as best-of-class, due to fuller foliage between late May and early June, and more uniform flowering in late May for ‘Emperor Red’. No pest symptoms were seen. Both cultivars experienced equally low plant death from soilborne disease. |
| Details of performance for this cultivar will be posted on the web in "Articles, Papers & Reports" at the completion of this trial. These details will include ratings over the entire season and pest problems. |
| Back to Color of Choice | Back to the Top |
|
Rose Class |
|
Picture date: |
21 May (week 15 1) | 5 June (week 17) | 19 June (week 19) | ||||
|
'Emperor Rose' |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field |
|
|||
| Cultivar No: 82 | |||||||
|
Picture date: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Seed Sowing Date |
Flower Diameter |
Days to First Flower2 |
Overall Foliage/Flower Rating3 |
Overall Pest Rating4 |
Overall Performance Rating5 |
| 2/8/2005 | 4.9 cm (1.9 inches) | 78 | 4.8 | 5.9 | 5.4 |
| Honors: |
| Comments: New entry for 2005. Emperor Rose’ did not replace ‘Bayou Rose’ as best-of-class, because the latter had slightly higher overall performance rating than ‘Emperor Rose’; however, performance looked very similar, the largest difference foliage fullness and uniformity occurring between late May and early June. More plant death from soilborne disease occurred to an equal degree to both cultivars in this class and exceeded all other classes of this begonia crop, thus having a greater impact on overall performance ratings values. |
|
Rose Class |
|
Picture date: |
21 May (week 15 1) | 5 June (week 17) | 19 June (week 19) | ||||
|
'Bayou Rose' |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field Plot C Sprayed Field |
Plot A Sprayed Field |
|
|||
| Cultivar No: 96 | |||||||
|
Picture date: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Seed Sowing Date |
Flower Diameter |
Days to First Flower2 |
Overall Foliage/Flower Rating3 |
Overall Pest Rating4 |
Overall Performance Rating5 |
| 2/8/2005 | 5.0 cm (2.0 inches) | 83 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 |
| Honors: Best-of-class. |
| Comments: Best-of-class in 2003. ‘Bayou Rose’ remained best-of-class with slightly higher overall performance rating than ‘Emperor Rose’; however, performance looked very similar, the largest difference foliage fullness and uniformity occurring between late May and early June. More plant death from soilborne disease occurred to an equal degree to both cultivars in this class and exceeded all other classes of this begonia crop, thus having a greater impact on overall performance ratings values. |
| Details of performance for this cultivar will be posted on the web in "Articles, Papers & Reports" at the completion of this trial. These details will include ratings over the entire season and pest problems. |
| Back to Color of Choice | Back to the Top |
|
White Class |
|
Picture date: |
21 May (week 15 1) | 5 June (week 17) | 19 June (week 19) | ||||
|
'Emperor White' |