| Click
on the crop below to view pictures over time and access data.
This study was conducted to evaluate performance of assorted crops
in a seasonal replicated trial that may be used by growers, landscapers,
consumers and seed companies as well as the scientific community.
Each crop was grown in two fields; one field was sprayed on demand and the
other was not sprayed. Each field contained three randomized
plots/crop containing 5 plants/plot.
Subjective ratings for foliage and flower quality
were made for each cultivar within each class
between 2 May and 16 Aug. Average
foliage and flower ratings represent relative cultivar quality within a
class, measured in the field sprayed on demand (simulating a commercial
environment), following pest scouting.
Pest symptoms were rated on
2 May and 16 Aug. in an unsprayed field (simulating a homeowner
environment).
In the full report (when added to website, found here: Articles,
Papers & Reports), we provided objective plant measurements
of vegetative and flower characteristics, earliness of flowering, flower
divergence (Table 1, sprayed field), as well as subjective ratings that
permit readers to evaluate foliage and flower characteristics (Table 2,
sprayed field) and the affects of pests (Tables 3 and 4, unsprayed field)
at different times during the season, and to evaluate performance over
time.
Subjective ratings were on a scale from 1 to 7 with the highest
rating of 7 for excellent.
In general, cultivars with vegetative and floral ratings >
6.0 were considered outstanding, 5.5 to 5.9 as very good, 5.0 to 5.4 as
good, 4.0 to 4.9 as fair and < 3.9 as to poor.
Overall performance ratings were adjusted to account for plant loss
from soilborne pests.
Cultivars were grouped into classes based on plant type (such as
growth habit), plant height and flower color.
|