Spring 2004
|
Click on the gator to view this season's crops growing in the flats: |
![]() |
| Scroll down to view crop list and access information. |
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Current
View of Variety Trials
(pictures taken every two weeks) Scroll down to view maps and individual crop development over time. |
| ROROK |
![]() |
| Click
on the crop below to view pictures over time and access data.
The pictures and data will be added for each species as time allows. This study was conducted to evaluate performance of assorted crops in a seasonal replicated trial that may be used by growers, landscapers, consumers and seed companies as well as the scientific community. Each crop was grown in two fields; one field was sprayed on demand and the other was not sprayed. Each field contained three randomized plots/crop containing 5 plants/plot. Subjective ratings for foliage and flower quality were made for each cultivar within each class between 28 Apr. and 2 July. Average foliage and flower ratings represent relative cultivar quality within a class, measured in the field sprayed on demand (simulating a commercial environment), following pest scouting. Pest symptoms were rated between 28 Apr. and 2 July in an unsprayed field (simulating a homeowner environment). In the full report (when added to website, found here: Articles, Papers & Reports), we provided objective plant measurements of vegetative and flower characteristics, earliness of flowering, flower divergence (Table 1, sprayed field), as well as subjective ratings that permit readers to evaluate foliage and flower characteristics (Table 2, sprayed field) and the affects of pests (Tables 3 and 4, unsprayed field) at different times during the season, and to evaluate performance over time. Subjective ratings were on a scale from 1 to 7 with the highest rating of 7 for excellent. In general, cultivars with vegetative and floral ratings > 6.0 were considered outstanding, 5.5 to 5.9 as very good, 5.0 to 5.4 as good, 4.0 to 4.9 as fair and < 3.9 as to poor. Overall performance ratings were adjusted to account for plant loss from soilborne pests. Cultivars were grouped into classes based on plant type (such as growth habit), plant height and flower color.
|
![]() |
Begonia | ![]() |
Celosia | ![]() |
|
| Coleus |
![]() |
Geranium | ![]() |
Gomphrena | ![]() |
| Grass, ornamental |
![]() |
Hibiscus | ![]() |
Impatiens | ![]() |
| Lavender, French |
![]() ![]() |
Nicotiana | ![]() |
Nierembergia | ![]() |
| Pentas |
![]() |
Petunia | ![]() |
Phlox, annual | ![]() |
| Plectranthus |
![]() |
Portulaca | ![]() |
Rudbeckia | ![]() |
| Salvia |
![]() |
Verbena | ![]() |
Vinca (Madagascar Periwinkle) | ![]() |
| Zinnia |
![]() |
Click on the dragonfly to access pests and beneficials. |
|||
|
|
| ROK
|
| Weather Data (PDF format) |
|
ROK
|
Do you wish to donate supplies or money to our program? Click on the gator for more information. |
| xxx
|
| To Archived Trials | |||
| GCREC-HOME | TRIALS FRONT PAGE | ORNAMENTALS RESEARCH PROGRAMS | |
| Back to Top |