Crop Performance

 Spring 2004

Click on the gator to view this season's crops growing in the flats:  

Scroll down to view crop list and access information.

 

Current View of Variety Trials

(pictures taken every two weeks)

Scroll down to view maps and individual crop development over time.

VT-Sp04-FieldA7a-2.JPG (329670 bytes) VT-Sp04-FieldA25a-2.JPG (299991 bytes) Field2-VT-Sp04-A7-3.JPG (384587 bytes) wpe238.jpg (129649 bytes)
Sprayed Field (A7 East) - May 14  Unsprayed Field (25 West) - May 14 Sprayed Field  (A7 East) -  May 31 Unsprayed Field (25 West) - May 31
Bay1b-VT-Sp04-2.JPG (316237 bytes)Bays1+2-VT-Sp04-2.JPG (312970 bytes) Bay6-VT-Sp04-2.JPG (333632 bytes)Bay7-VT-Sp04-2.JPG (336785 bytes) FieldBay1d-VT-Sp04-imp-Bays6+7-3.JPG (329034 bytes)

FieldBay1e-VT-Sp04-imp-Bays6+7-3.JPG (366441 bytes)

FieldBay2a-VT-Sp04-imp-Bays6+7-3.JPG (359023 bytes) FieldBay6c-VT-Sp04-imp-Bays6+7-3.JPG (342058 bytes)

FieldBay6f-VT-Sp04-imp-Bays6+7-3.JPG (412315 bytes)

FieldBay7b-VT-Sp04-imp-Bays6+7-3.JPG (337471 bytes)
Sprayed Saran House (Bays 1 & 2) - 24 May Unsprayed Saran House (Bays 6 & 7) - 24 May Sprayed Saran House (Bays 1 &2) - 8 June Unsprayed Saran House (Bays 6 & 7) - 8 June 
ROROK
Click on the crop below to view pictures over time and access data.  

The pictures and data will be added for each species as time allows.

    This study was conducted to evaluate performance of assorted crops in a seasonal replicated trial that may be used by growers, landscapers, consumers and seed companies as well as the scientific community.  Each crop was grown in two fields; one field was sprayed on demand and the other was not sprayed.  Each field contained three randomized plots/crop containing 5 plants/plot.    Subjective ratings for foliage and flower quality were made for each cultivar within each class between 28 Apr. and 2 July. Average foliage and flower ratings represent relative cultivar quality within a class, measured in the field sprayed on demand (simulating a commercial environment), following pest scouting.  Pest symptoms were rated between 28 Apr. and 2 July in an unsprayed field (simulating a homeowner environment).

   In the full report (when added to website, found here: Articles, Papers & Reports), we provided objective plant measurements of vegetative and flower characteristics, earliness of flowering, flower divergence (Table 1, sprayed field), as well as subjective ratings that permit readers to evaluate foliage and flower characteristics (Table 2, sprayed field) and the affects of pests (Tables 3 and 4, unsprayed field) at different times during the season, and to evaluate performance over time.  Subjective ratings were on a scale from 1 to 7 with the highest rating of 7 for excellent.  In general, cultivars with vegetative and floral ratings > 6.0 were considered outstanding, 5.5 to 5.9 as very good, 5.0 to 5.4 as good, 4.0 to 4.9 as fair and < 3.9 as to poor.  Overall performance ratings were adjusted to account for plant loss from soilborne pests.  Cultivars were grouped into classes based on plant type (such as growth habit), plant height and flower color.

 

Agastache

Begonia Celosia
Coleus Geranium  Gomphrena
Grass, ornamental Hibiscus Impatiens
Lavender, French Nicotiana Nierembergia
Pentas Petunia Phlox, annual
Plectranthus Portulaca Rudbeckia
Salvia Verbena Vinca (Madagascar Periwinkle)
Zinnia  

Click on the dragonfly to access pests and beneficials.

ROK

 

Weather Data (PDF format)

ROK

 

 

Do you wish to donate supplies or money to our program?   Click on the gator for more information. 

xxx

 

To Recent Trials

To Archived Trials
GCREC-HOME TRIALS FRONT PAGE ORNAMENTALS RESEARCH PROGRAMS
Back to Top