|
Flower Color, Plot Development Over Time, Data and Comments |
|
Data and pictures will be added as time allows. |
|
|
|
Vinca |
| GCREC-HOME | ORNAMENTALS RESEARCH PROGRAMS | BACK to CURRENT TRIAL |
|
Vinca |
| Botany |
| Family: | Amaranthaceae | ||
| Scientific names: | Gomphrena globosa L.[The Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)]. | ||
| Common names: | Bachelor's-button, common globe-amaranth, and globe-amaranth (GRIN); also known by the genus name, gomphrena. | ||
| Native habitat: | South Asia. Naturalized and widely cultivated (GRIN). | ||
View
maps related to habitat and other topics from this link to the National
Geographic MapMachine: . |
|||
| Pests | |||
| Common plant arthropods (insects/other)/other: | Reported arthropod symptoms in literature: Gomphrena is free of most pest problems; aphids, mites and thips have been noted in some reports (Greenhouse IPM Notes Rutgers University). We have observed leaftier larva in small numbers. The difference between similar pests: How to Distinguish Oak LEAFTIERS From LEAFROLLERS. | ||
| Arthropod symptoms observed in this trial: | |||
| Common plant diseases/other: | Reported disease symptoms in literature: Foliar lesions similar to Alternaria have been observed but not confirmed in our trials; Colletotrichum dematium, dieback is listed as pathogen on Gomphrena globosa (CAB International, Crop Protection Compedium, 2003). | ||
| Diseases symptoms observed in this trial: | |||
| Commercial control: | Greenhouse. | Field/shade house. | |
| Arthropod information: | Pests identified on crops. | Florida pest facts and images. | |
| Disease information: | Plant Disease Facts (Pennsylvania State University) | The American Phytopathological Society | |
|
More Links and Information |
|||
| Performance evaluations: | Trial reports and other publications. | ||
| More resources: | Additional information. | ||
| Honors: | Best-of-class (BC). We select the best performer in each class, based on the "overall performance rating". This rating may not be high, if the class does not perform well (indicating a possible need for improvement in the class). The rating may be significantly different from one or more members of the class. If two or more members of a class received the same highest overall performance rating, we used another rating (such as overall foliage/flower rating or flower average rating) to determine BC. If only one cultivar was entered in a class, it automatically becomes uncontested BC. BC is evaluated in future trials against the performance of new entries in the same class. Refer to a report in "Articles, Papers & Reports" for detailed information. In addition to BC, other "honors" received for these cultivars may be added to BC at a later date, time permitting. Seed companies may forward these honors (awards) to Rick Kelly. |
| Rating System: | The rating is a 1 to 7 scale: 7- all foliage and flowers free from defects; 4- average foliage and flower condition, minimal plant defects or pest damage to tissue, but still acceptable; 1- foliage and/or flowers with severe defects and/or severely infested with pests and damage unacceptable, making plant undesirable. Plant death due to soilborne pests may be factored into the overall performance rating, if it is a significant problem. Refer to a report in "Articles, Papers & Reports" for details. If listed, ratings with an "a" are the best in a class. If cultivars share the same letters, those ratings are considered to be similar to each other. If there are no letters, there is only one cultivar in a class or all the members of a class have similar ratings. |
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Zebra
Swallowtail (Eurytides marcellus) feasting on nectar from
gomphrena flowers. Click "Zebra Swallowtail" to read about
this featured creature; also, click on the picture to view more pictures
of this insect species. Click on the gator to view another
swallowtail species feeding on wallflower nectar: Click on the monarch butterfly picture below to visit a site dedicated to Florida butterflies (Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services - Division of Plant Industry): |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Scroll down the page or click on the color of choice to view individual cultivars within a color class: |
|
|
|
Winter |
|
|
|
Winter |
|
Tall purple class |
|
Picture date: |
1 May (week 121) | 14 May (week 13) | 31 May (week 16) | ||||
|
'Purple Gomp' |
Sprayed Field Unsprayed Field |
Sprayed Field Unsprayed Field |
Sprayed Field Unsprayed Field |
||||
| Cultivar No: 57 | |||||||
|
Picture date: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Seed Sowing Date |
Flower Diameter2 |
Days to First Flower3 |
Overall Foliage/Flower Rating4 |
Overall Pest Rating5 |
Overall Performance Rating6 |
| 11 Feb. | 1.8 (0.7) | 49 | 5.5 | 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Honors: Best-of-class for the color class, uncontested. |
| Comments: New for spring 2004. Performance was similar to the best-class, 'Bicolor Rose'. Bicolor Rose (best-of-class, spring 2003) and 'Purple Gomp' (new for spring 2004) both had a similarly outstanding adjusted overall performance, but Bicolor Rose had a higher rating value. Both remain uncontested best-of-class for their color class. See 'Bicolor Rose' for more comments on performance. |
| Details of performance for this cultivar will be posted on the web in "Articles, Papers & Reports" at the completion of this trial. These details will include ratings over the entire season and pest problems. |
| Back to Color of Choice | Back to the Top |
|
Tall purple/white class |
|
Picture date: |
1 May (week 12) | 14 May (week 13) | 31 May (week 16) | ||||
|
'Bicolor Rose' |
Sprayed Field Unsprayed Field |
Sprayed Field Unsprayed Field |
Sprayed Field Unsprayed Field |
||||
| Cultivar No: 59 | |||||||
|
Picture date: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Seed Sowing Date |
Flower Diameter2 |
Days to First Flower3 |
Overall Foliage/Flower Rating4 |
Overall Pest Rating5 |
Overall Performance Rating6 |
| 11 Feb. | 2.0 (0.8) | 49 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 6.2 |
| Honors: Best-of-class for the color class, uncontested; best-of-class in this special comparison between the species classes. |
Comments: Best-of-class
established in spring
2003. Bicolor Rose (best-of-class, spring 2003) and 'Purple
Gomp' (new for spring 2004) both had a similarly
outstanding adjusted overall performance in this special comparison
of the species. Both
cultivars are uncontested best-of-class for their color class.
Bicolor Rose was a
slightly taller plant; flowering was
initiated at the same time for both cultivars.
Both cultivars had excellent flower production and quality in early
June, while Bicolor Rose had denser foliage than
Purple Gomp. Both
cultivars were showing some signs of chlorosis in June.
In spring 2003, Bicolor Rose showed lodging that was believed to be due
to lack of plant support on raised beds from a staggered instead of a
linear arrangement of plants; neither cultivar lodged in this trial. Pest
damage was minimal. See pictures of insects
or disease
on this crop.
|
| Details of performance for this cultivar will be posted on the web in "Articles, Papers & Reports" at the completion of this trial. These details will include ratings over the entire season and pest problems. |
| ROK |
| 1. The number of weeks from seed sowing to the date the plant was photographed. Photographs were taken in a field sprayed on demand as needed, after scouting for pests, and a field that is not sprayed at all. |
| 2. Measured in centimeters and inches [cm (inches)]. |
| 3. Average number of days from sowing to unfurling of the first flower in the plots. Flowering for alyssum was completed in the flat prior to planting in the field. Values with an "a" are considered significantly greater than those with a "b", "c", etc., and those without a letter are not considered to be significantly different. |
| 4. The average of the combined foliage and flower data in the sprayed field as an expression of cultivar quality. Values with an "a" are considered significantly greater than those with a "b", "c", etc., and those without a letter are not considered to be significantly different. |
| 5. The average of the combined foliage and flower data in the unsprayed field as an expression of arthropod and disease symptoms. Values with an "a" are considered significantly greater than those with a "b", "c", etc., and those without a letter are not considered to be significantly different. |
| 6. The average of the combined overall foliage/flower rating and overall pest rating. If plant death from a soilborne pathogen resulted, this was factored into the rating. Values with an "a" are considered significantly greater than those with a "b", "c", etc., and those without a letter are not considered to be significantly different. See Articles, Papers & Reports for further explanation in the reports. |
|
|
| GCREC-HOME | ORNAMENTALS RESEARCH PROGRAMS | |
| Back to the Top | Back to Color of Choice | Back to Current Trial |